Posts Tagged: videogames


1
Jul 16

VIDEOGAMES: DESIGN IMAGINATION FAIL, FAIL, FAILLLLL

Never mind what game inspired this (Halo 5) but, nowadays in many fps (and third person games) you get many fine qualities but also a big tendency to fall back on trite over-familiar crapola from decades ago. Yes we get wonderful graphics, wonderful action, good drama and actions and voices in cut scenes, good voice actors (That Guy from Firefly and Castle in Halo 5, among others), pretty good settings, generally good interfaces, good music, relatively few glitches and when there are some they try to get patches to you…many good qualities. BUT there are egregious old cliches built into the structures of these rather expensive games and few designers are thinking outside the box. FOR EXAMPLE, we still have “bosses” at intervals, adversaries who are big and harder to kill, and so very very familiar, no matter the details. They usually have the same sneering British diction.

We still have to go to series of devices and switch them off to cause some remarkably primitive super futuristic super high tech device to overheat (!) as if they were steam engines or something. Or you have to switch off a series of powering devices to cut off a force field, and fight your way to each switch, etc. Or you have to–fill in the blank–some other object in some very very familiar way.

Thankfully they don’t make you crawl through extraneous overly convenient ventilation passages as much as they used to. But you have to fly or drive through mazes, you have to shoot flying vehicles in a way that is remarkably like arcade games from 1990, in a somewhat fancier modulation…Oh and you have to build up inventories of something until you create a Thing…and for some reason though you often work for a gigantic powerful military force you’re dropped behind enemy lines with a shitty rifle and a shitty pistol and you have to scavenge better weapons that are lying about on the ground. The whole “find ten power gems to power your energizer blaster” or whatever is very very old…

I could list many more examples. What I’m suggesting is, we are still encountering archaicisms and a general failure of the imagination in game structuring and story.

Some games try to get away from this–RPG games TRY and though individual missions tend to break down to the same thing (like the dreaded building-the-transporter device in Fallout 4) you sometimes get more interesting variations with RPG…


29
Oct 14

HATRED: It’s a Game.

HATRED. It’s a game…an actual videogame coming in 2015–and may well become the most controversial videogame ever. For good reason.

“The player-character is a mass-killing villain who hates humanity and begins a “genocidal crusade”[1] to kill innocent civilians and police officers.” (That’s wikipedia on this game which is almost self parodying in the name that was chosen for it–HATRED) — so, violence in a game with a reasonably decent heroic player, I accept; but violence where the gamer plays as a serial killer, plays as a vicious mass murderer, no. To me…that’s the difference here.

If one is playing a game when one is taking out clearly defined evil people who prey on the innocent, I feel that’s acceptable. I do play Call of Duty. I’m not saying Call of Duty and other games of that ilk are never problematic–in the case of a psychopathic personality, a person really on the edge, it’s possible that first person shooter games like Call of Duty could contribute to that person’s pathology; that is, they could nudge him (her?) a little more in the direction of acting out violently in the real world, if they’re already leaning that way. *Maybe.*

There was a real life especially vicious gang in Oakland–a small gang, but a gang–that used to ritually play Grand Theft Auto before going out and committing their crimes. But those people were going to be dangerous anyway.

Yet… we’re looking at a game where people are playing a psychokiller and that’s how they WIN, by killing the innocent, by mass murder…some weakminded brutish individuals could conceivably be pushed into unconsciously accepting the game as an kind of endorsement or validation of thrill-killing.

I don’t think any game can make a murderer out of a psychologically healthy person. But there are lots of unhealthy people and some are quite borderline. Low IQ people could also be at risk.

I would be unable to play the game Hatred. I hope it’s not widely released in this country.

Again: The player-character is a mass-killing villain who hates humanity and begins a “genocidal crusade”[1] to kill innocent civilians and police officers