Posts Tagged: progressives


6
Nov 17

Only One Thing Can Save This Country from Fascism

Actually there’s only one thing that will save this country. Because the problem isn’t just Trump; it isn’t just his cabinet bent on ruining schools and the environment. It’s also the right-wing stranglehold in the Supreme Court; it’s voter suppression; it’s the vacuous who buy into fraudulent news sources, and the yawners who sneer at the value of voting; and of course it’s the Republican party…It comes down to laws; to congress, and courts.

And the one thing that will save us, ultimately, is fundamentally altering the makeup of the United States Senate and the House of Representatives; which means *getting out the vote*, getting more people than ever before to vote for progressives in the mid term elections and in 2020. Large numbers of people who basically feel as we do just don’t vote. That has to change.

There has to be so many new and determined voters the Republicans and the alt-right can’t stop them with gerrymandering and suppressing voters and fake-news. It has to be overwhelming. And it could be done–if we made finding new progressive voters our primary mission. Which means convincing caring, decent people that voting *does* matter; it means spending more to educate people on the issues so we fuel their determination for action at the ballot box. Only a major change in voting patterns will save this country.


26
Jun 17

Do Conservatives Fear Complexity?

One of the problems with Democrats and progressives standing up to conservatives (and “conservatives” as in Trump, who actually believes in nothing but Trump), is that progressive people recognize truth in *complexity*. The other side usually rejects complexity as if it were a kind of amoral smokescreen. It’s much easier to say, “a fifteen dollar national minimum wage is a giveaway to people who don’t want to work harder for more money” than to explain that 1) it’s not that much money, it’s an expensive society to live in 2) the money stimulates the economy overall because the average person will have more money to spend, and they’ll spend it 3) the evidence is that low-wage laborers work as hard as anyone else does, often harder. There are also four and five and six in the ever-more-complex but convincing list of considerations.

Same goes for food stamps/SNAP programs, and other safety nets–most people who get them *are* working already, and under tough circumstances, but it’s easier to say they’re loafers. It’s simply easier to say that single-payer healthcare, medicaid, and so on, are “only needed by people who haven’t worked hard enough” than it is to explain that medical problems can come out of nowhere and be overwhelming even for hard working, wage-earning people, and many working people have become homeless because of medical bills, and it actually helps the economy when we don’t have to rescue them with emergency rooms and special housing and we’ve allowed medical costs to get out of control in this country…and more.

It’s easier to say, “the free market will eventually end pollution” than to explain how the history of regulations and how they are not harmful to the marketplace.

It’s not that Republicans are (ironically) intellectually lazy, in particular, it’s just that they feel safer with simpler explanations, with echoing some parental homily, than with the uneven, challenging ground of complexity…Simplification offers simple emotional satisfaction.