Posts Tagged: conservatives


24
Sep 17

There Are No Liberals, and There Are No Conservatives

There are no liberals and there are no conservatives, really. There are only people who believe in a fair degree of sharing and mutual help, and people who don’t.

There are only people who agree that there are innate human rights, and people who don’t.

There are only people who believe that foreign persons are as human as we are, and people who don’t.

There are only people who believe in the value of science, and people who don’t.

There are only people who believe that empathy isĀ  vital, and people who don’t.

There are only people who treasure the natural world, and people who don’t.

There are only people who believe that women are equal to men, and people who don’t.

There are only people who believe that institutions can be an expression of decency and kindness, and people who don’t.

There are no liberals, or conservatives. Political categorization leads to knee-jerk, mindless judgments, and obscures commonality.


26
Jun 17

Do Conservatives Fear Complexity?

One of the problems with Democrats and progressives standing up to conservatives (and “conservatives” as in Trump, who actually believes in nothing but Trump), is that progressive people recognize truth in *complexity*. The other side usually rejects complexity as if it were a kind of amoral smokescreen. It’s much easier to say, “a fifteen dollar national minimum wage is a giveaway to people who don’t want to work harder for more money” than to explain that 1) it’s not that much money, it’s an expensive society to live in 2) the money stimulates the economy overall because the average person will have more money to spend, and they’ll spend it 3) the evidence is that low-wage laborers work as hard as anyone else does, often harder. There are also four and five and six in the ever-more-complex but convincing list of considerations.

Same goes for food stamps/SNAP programs, and other safety nets–most people who get them *are* working already, and under tough circumstances, but it’s easier to say they’re loafers. It’s simply easier to say that single-payer healthcare, medicaid, and so on, are “only needed by people who haven’t worked hard enough” than it is to explain that medical problems can come out of nowhere and be overwhelming even for hard working, wage-earning people, and many working people have become homeless because of medical bills, and it actually helps the economy when we don’t have to rescue them with emergency rooms and special housing and we’ve allowed medical costs to get out of control in this country…and more.

It’s easier to say, “the free market will eventually end pollution” than to explain how the history of regulations and how they are not harmful to the marketplace.

It’s not that Republicans are (ironically) intellectually lazy, in particular, it’s just that they feel safer with simpler explanations, with echoing some parental homily, than with the uneven, challenging ground of complexity…Simplification offers simple emotional satisfaction.