Uncategorized


6
Sep 10

They Dream of Awakening: the Esoteric Urge behind the Matrix and other Films

[article by John Shirley, a slightly truncated version appeared in PARABOLA Magazine]

I was walking through “the yard” at San Quentin State Prison. The prisoners sunning themselves at tables near the worn baseball field would have pleased any casting director with their do-rags and the home-made prison tattoos on muscular bare arms. The man walking with me, though, was smallish, balding, middle aged, and pale, making me think of an accountant. He might once have been an accountant, I don’t know; I do know he’s a convicted murderer.

I was a volunteer, teaching writing to inmates. My companion had written a script, which, thematically, was about a man driven by his origins to do bad things, but with something higher struggling to emerge in him. I said, “You have sports, television, work, time to walk freely within the walls—and you’ve been here since 1978. Do you stay so busy you forget, for awhile, that you’re incarcerated, and just feel like this is normal life?”
He told me that if he keeps busy, he can “sort of” forget. But he added that he can never really forget he’s in prison. “You try not to think about it too much, but…” He looked at the armed guard strolling by. “There are constant reminders. It’s always there. You feel it.” Even at the best times, the defining negativity of his situation loomed in the background, casting barbed wire shadows.

Unsurprisingly, the group of inmates composing screenplays often wrote, indirectly, about people who were trapped, in some way. And it’s not surprising when screenwriters and authors, moving “freely” in the outside world, write about their own existential conditions, and spiritual conditions, even when they might suppose themselves writing about something else entirely.

Recently, seeing the trailer for a new film, The Invasion, I remembered that day volunteering in prison. Starring Nicole Kidman, The Invasion is the second remake of the classic science-fiction horror film, Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Based on a novel by Jack Finney, the Body Snatcher movies portray an isolated town in the grip of an invisible alien invasion. The invaders take over the bodies of locals, making them, one by one, cold-hearted players in an extraterrestrial conspiracy. Your wife or your father still look like your wife and father, and talk like them. But it’s not them anymore; they’ve become numb biological robots. Key to The Invasion—it’s even in the trailer—is the admonition: “Don’t fall asleep!” Because, the film warns, it’s when you’re asleep that your body is snatched. In his essay for Invasion of the Body Snatchers: A Tribute, Jeff Zaleski observes:

Invasion of the Body Snatchers poses a terror that is fundamentally spiritual: the lost of that special something that makes us human. . .Yet the story also offers a metaphor for a less obvious but more insidious threat. . .It’s well known but rarely discussed that the world’s five major religions teach another fundamental truth abut the human condition…that we spend our lives mostly in a dreamlike state—lost in our thoughts, so lost in our thoughts that we are cut off from the sensation of our bodies and full awareness of the real world. This teaching can be found in the esoteric branches of each major religion….”

Finney’s novel and the Body Snatcher movies may have been intended more as political than spiritual metaphor. Invasion of the Body Snatchers came out in an era charged with a fear of Communists supposedly bent on turning our world into a Godless dictatorship of the proletariat. But political themes may mask deeper insights. A look at The Invasion and other films suggests that many popular films are actually unconscious (or only partly conscious) expressions of esoteric truths. Metaphors for a spiritual condition are found in unlikely places—but they are found persistently because, like the man who “kept busy” in San Quentin, we all know, on some level, that we’re in prison. We know, too, that there’s a possibility of freedom just on the other side of a certain wall.

Despite our strait-jacketed condition, something in us senses that we’re asleep and struggles, at times, to wake up. Even when we haven’t encountered esoteric teachings, we know something’s wrong: that we are living in a twilight world, where the light is too dim; that we are driven by drivers we cannot see. This unconscious, uneasy half comprehension of our condition finds expression in popular art—especially in theater and film.
Consider the plays of Samuel Beckett. In his unnerving, austere productions, characters walk about in “purgatorial loops,” repeating nightmarish scenarios, seeming caught up in entrapping states of mind. They battle for dignity, for some eking out of individuality. In Beckett’s short play Catastrophe, two ruthlessly officious, controlling individuals, a “director” and his secretary, set about arranging, as if toying with a wire framework, a miserable-looking, ragged old man frozen on a stage. At the end, the old man, against directions, lifts his head, and looks up at the audience—a tiny act of defiance. It’s all he can manage, so controlled is he by outside forces. Beckett spoke of his plays as “objects”, and probably wasn’t consciously making a spiritual statement. But again and again he poignantly expressed man’s condition: trapped, mechanical, struggling to emerge from a puppet’s purgatory.

Television has its moments of inadvertent insight into our trapped, sleeping condition: going back a ways, one of the most popular television antagonists was The Borg in Star Trek: The Next Generation. The Borg is all one being made up of lesser beings, a cyborgian fusion of man and machine that assimilates individuals, over riding their free will and turning them into mindless components of an artificial Archon. Besides dramatizing mindless subjection to automaticity, the Borg may be a parable of our fear that we’re becoming disastrously dependent on the electronic and digital superstructure of our cell phone, iPod-dominated culture.

Popular film resonates with themes that speak of our tendency to lapse into sleep when we think we’re awake—one of the most obvious, striking examples in recent times is The Matrix. Starring Keanu Reeves, The Matrix is about a man who discovers that the entire human world is asleep and dreaming, kept that way by enslaving artificial intelligences. Human beings are so controlled by computers they become seamlessly blended into the digital world. A rebel leader has liberated a cadre of revolutionaries one of whom makes a secret deal with the artificial intelligence—he will betray the rebels if he can be allowed a fabricated dream-life of his own choosing. The traitor may represent the inner resistance a seeker feels when presented with the possibility of awakening.

Numerous films point to the same truths with a timeliness and convergence of intent that somehow make them part of an inadvertent “movement” in cinema. I’m thinking particularly of American Beauty, Fight Club, Dark City, eXistenZ, Mulholland Drive, The Truman Show, Vanilla Sky, Waking Life, Simone, The Island, and now The Invasion.

Sam Mendes’ American Beauty, written by Alan Ball, is the story of a dysfunctional family lost in the centerless maze of modern life. Kevin Spacey’s character can’t touch his wife in any way that matters; he can’t reach his daughter though she’s right in the same house with him. He has an encounter with a pot-dealing young bohemian who moves in next door—whose obsession with the innate visual beauty of the ordinary world seems an adventure in perception—and is inspired to wrestle his way free of his middle class funk. The overall impression is of a man recognizing that he’s been asleep, dreaming his way through an air conditioned, wall-to-wall-carpeted misery—who had forgotten the choices, the almost infinite ways out, that life offers to the wakeful in every single second of existence. As a side note, Ball’s television series Six Feet Under, about a family of morticians– each episode’s prologue dramatizing the death of a client– might be regarded as an oblique reminder of the importance of living consciously in the moment, with death always in the offing.

In David Fincher’s visceral Fight Club, characters desperate for connection to something real go to 12-step groups for problems they don’t have, just to feel emotions by proxy; they are so desperate to rid themselves of existential numbness that they start a Fight Club, where ordinary people meet in secret to beat each other bloody. It isn’t the violence they want—it’s the return to realness in the moment brought about by powerful, unavoidable living contact. They allude to a society caught up in consumerism and corporate striving, dumbfounded by masks and media-star worship and empty recreation—and they recognize that it’s all a kind of sleepwalking, a hypnotic state that must be struggled with, even battered with bare fists.

Alex Proyas’ Dark City is a stylish noir fantasy, a Gnostic fable, about a man who finds himself on a search for truth and identity in a shape-shifting city that turns out to be a living urban stage designed for sinister, arcane purposes by malignant entities—all may be a dream, or may not.

David Cronenberg’s ‘eXistenZ‘ involves a virtual-reality videogame that –like so many Philip Dick-influenced tales—makes us wonder where reality ends and the game begins. Fantasy and reality inevitably overlap in this film. There are anti-game revolutionaries in the background, and the game’s player wonders what’s real, and if the game could be a game within a game…

In David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive, a young actress seems to have her soul, or identity, stolen by evil forces embedded in the city of Los Angeles (no one who’s worked in The Business there needs much convincing), as she goes through an enigmatic quest to find her real nature— in what turns out to be, apparently, a dream.

In Peter Weir’s The Truman Show, Jim Carrey discovers he’s in a false reality, literally staged by people who are using him as an entertainment and have done so for a generation. He must find the confines of the staging area and break out into the real world, to find actual love, an unscripted destiny.

Cameron Crowe’s Vanilla Sky was inspired by a European film; this Tom Cruise vehicle once again gives us a hero who by degrees realizes that his nightmarish reality is fabricated, is intricately computer-animated and transmitted into his brain which is in modified cryogenic freeze. He chooses to wake up, and face the real world of a dark future, rather than the comforting dreams the cryogenics company offers him.

Richard Linklater’s Waking Life—an intriguing innovation perfectly fusing conventional movie-photography and animation—gives us a hero who keeps waking up from a complex dream that seems to push him into profound social and philosophical dialogues with the sundry intellectual outlaws he encounters; only, each time he’s sure he’s awakened, he finds, once more, he’s only dreaming.

Andrew Niccol’s Simone is a comedy about a movie director who’s so disgusted with actors that he computer-generates Simone, a beautiful actress programmed with the best of all the great female movie stars. The audience falls in love with her and people refuse to accept she’s not real, even when he tries to tell them so. Simone sends up the public’s willingness to collaborate with illusion on a global scale.

In Michael Bay’s The Island, the hero discovers that his world, which seems to be the only refuge in a world supposedly ravaged by catastrophe is actually a factory for creating clones used by the rich for spare parts, and the free, living world is hidden but intact and waiting for him beyond the walls of social illusion.

And now we have The Invasion, directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel. Said to be less effective than the Don Siegel original, the film nevertheless dramatizes (probably unconsciously) the central dark fact of the human condition: when we allow consciousness to lapse, we surrender our ability to make choices, deferring to lower sub-selves and their mindless agenda.

Whether these are great works of art is not important. What matters is the emergence of a remarkable number of films questioning reality itself– each suggesting a sinister puppeteer, pointing to a kind of dreamy disorientation prevailing in the median consciousness of the industrialized world—seems a defined cultural current, however unplanned, emerging from a consensus about our condition. What is it we’re trying to tell ourselves, with The Matrix, and all these other films on the same theme?

These filmmakers are not deliberately making reference to esoteric ideas–but on some level they seem to confirm insights basic to Vipassana Buddhism, certain forms of Sufism, Esoteric Christianity, and G.I. Gurdjieff’s Fourth Way. Artists express their perception, however murky, of the human condition. And a perceptual consensus is beginning to emerge: mankind is asleep, mechanical, strictured, fragmentary.

Most everyone has had a dark dream that they struggled to wake from. A few nights ago I had a chance encounter on the street with an unbalanced stranger who claimed to have a concealed pistol–he threatened to shoot me if I got too close to his new truck. I doubted he had a gun at all, and took it in stride, shrugging it off, but deep down the encounter disturbed me. That night I dreamt I was in a public crowded public square, where a belligerent man argued with me, then ran and got a large automatic pistol from his friends. The crowd watched in vague amusement as I ducked behind a car to avoid getting shot. On some level—this often happens when I have nightmares—I knew I was asleep. It took a few moments, but I somehow deliberately wrested myself out of sleep, so that I wouldn’t have to dream of being shot.

My anxiety about the threatening man on the street was not unfounded, in our gun-burdened society, and my dream was a way to process that anxiety. Films are like dreams; they extol the social subconscious. The films in our incomplete list are roughly along the same lines. They are cinematic dreams mulling over real dilemmas our so-called “conscious” minds are only dimly aware of. These films are external representations of inner processes: the higher part of us struggling to awaken, to warn us we’re in danger of losing our birthright.

Some of us drift through our lives like pollen; others bounce energetically from one interaction to another like the reflective silver sphere in a pinball machine. Sometimes, spurred by inner compulsions and external conditions, we imagine that we are doing great things in the world; we become reformers, or master criminals. We run for President.

But on some level, no matter what we seem to accomplish, we know that the whole time, we were asleep. Like the people in comas who are often seen to struggle to awaken, we make feeble, indirect efforts to protest our numbness, to acknowledge that transcendence is tantalizingly near. We go to amusement parks for rocket-fast rides that thrill us into momentary contact with our bodies and the present moment; we try sky diving, bungee jumping, extreme sports. Some people go in for drugs and speak portentously of their fitful, veering experiences with altered consciousness. And film makers protest their sleep through movies like The Matrix, an adrenaline-pumping action movie which seeks to combine thrill seeking with the notion of our subjectivity to mechanicality and the possibility of awakening to real freedom.

These films rarely offer straightforward solutions to the dilemmas they pose. Although “fight clubs” do exist, the novel (by Chuck Palahniuk) and film Fight Club are actually presenting only satirical solutions. Questioning the status quo –and a willingness to use desperate means for escape–

Still, The Matrix seems to symbolically suggest something like the Buddhist and Fourth Way process of “self observation”: the hero takes steps to wake up, only to find he’s connected to machinery that has kept him drugged, fed and subjected to a false digital “reality.” Waking enough to see this machinery, he’s able to unplug himself from it and escape to liberation. That is, when a man really looks, really observes for himself that he is mechanical, he has the possibility of freedom from the machine.

The Invasion offers us only an alert willingness to question the apparent, and a feverish determination to find a way out of the trap at all costs. The Island’s implicit advice is essentially the same. Vanilla Sky’s hero chooses to face a harsh reality as it is—to look it square in the eye, acknowledging the painfulness of seeing what is, and intimating that in the end the discomfort is freeing.

The young actress in Mulholland Drive seems to be on a search for some lasting, essential self—something beyond the ephemeral, and Lynch hints that there’s an essence to be found, eventually. In Waking Life and eXistenZ we’re directed to questioning the status quo, and our own assumed reality; we’re called to interrogate existence with an active mind.

In The Truman Show, Peter Weir goes farther. Question the status quo—then go on a journey, regardless of the difficulties and your own resistance, to the other side of the façade, where you’d better be willing to see not only the falseness of the staging, but your own.

There are, of course, films like the heavy handed but charming classic The Razor’s Edge, Harold Ramis’ Groundhog Day and Terry Gilliam’s The Fisher King, that address spiritual themes more directly. In what seems a play on ideas of recurrence from Nietzsche and PD Ouspensky, Bill Murray’s character in Groundhog Day is condemned to live the same life over and over again till he sees himself, finally, as he truly is–and sees the consequences of real choices. In The Fisher King the scripter uses Hermetic symbols like the grail to symbolize the path to redemption through renunciation of the ego. Jeff Bridges plays a vain talk radio host who inadvertently causes a tragedy. Tormented by guilt, he has to risk all, in an act of selfish love, to escape the suffering brought on by identification.

But films that express the human dilemma unconsciously, like a poignant cry from a child with night terrors, somehow strike more honestly to the heart of our condition. The sudden outpouring of films that show their heroes struggling to escape confinement by the walls of sleep makes us wonder.

We wonder if the human world is becoming restless in its sleep.


3
Sep 10

a stroll with Death

Death came over this morning. Wanted company. He reassured me. “Naw, I’m just lonely, nobody to talk to, it’s not That Time yet.” We strolled down to the liquor store. He bought me a cigar. “You would buy me tobacco!” I said. We had a good laugh at that. It was a good cigar. He got some cognac. I declined. “Too early in the day for me.” He looked at me, and–perhaps out of kindness, or perhaps out of a desire to not say the predictable thing–chose not to say that it was later than I thought.


3
Sep 10

everything monotonous

Opened my eyes after sitting meditation this morning to find the moment was unique: the familiar ordinary cat on the porch rail was unique, the familiar pose it was in was unique, the familiar movement of a flying bug passing by was unique, the sounds of cars, never had been heard before…not exactly like that. Everything monotonous and ordinary and banal is at the same time perfectly unique.


25
Aug 10

EXCERPT from the new eReads edition of my novel THE OTHER END

…The smell of the cages hit her,then. She stopped, blinking. Boyce didn’t seem to notice the silence, the staring,the smells, but only stalked through the room, smiling faintly, looking from side to side.

“So these animals are for medical experiments?” Boyce asked. “To find cures for diseases?”

“Diseases? Not at all,” she said, stepping through the door. “At least you could argue that kind of animal testing is necessary—though there’s usually an alternative. But this is all about perfume and cosmetics, that kind of thing. They develop new cosmetics, test them on animals…they use extreme amounts of raw chemicals. Completely needless stuff. We have enough cosmetics in the world. Wedon’t really need them at all, really.”

He nodded, looking into the eyes of a small terrier nearby. “The suffering emanates from the constraint—as much as the pain of the experiments,” he said. “They’re becoming…” He seemed to think for a moment. “Psychotic. Becoming psychotic from feeling trapped in a smallspace day after day, endlessly. It’s worse than the physical torture—suchthings always are, as they reach into the creature’s Substantive Being.”

“Their what?”

But then a supervisor in a lab coat burst into the room, with a security guard close behind; the guard had a gun in his hand, held down at his side. A spindly man with thin hair, the security guard had a look on his face he’d probably seen in a movie about commandos. The lab supervisor, a stocky graying man with a close-cut beard and a bulbous, red-veined nose, wire-rim glasses, seemed to shiver in icy fury as he stumped down the aisle between cages toward them. “You people are under arrest! You don’t want to get shot,you put your hands on your heads, right goddamn now!”

“You should let me say that,” the security guard complained, in a low aside. He pointed the gun at Boyce and bellowed, “Come on, hands on your heads!”

In a movement that seemed more polite than frightened, Boyce put his hands on his head. “Like this?”

“That’s…well yeah.” The supervisor broke off, shaking his head. He had an ID badge hanging around his neck that said, Silk Scents and below that, Roger Capwell.

“Okay now,” the security guard said,”You too girlie, hands on your head.” Everyone ignored him.

“Mr. Capwell—” Ama said. “The door just opened so I thought we could come in. We’re bearing witness to…to…”

She broke off, shuddering, as the pulses spread through the air, seeming to come from the space directly over Boyce’s head. She felt the vibrations palpably, in flesh and bone; felt them humming between her teeth, making her feel nauseated and elated at the same time.

Suddenly the dogs began barking and the cats began yowling again. The cages clamored with their sound.

Exactly then, the room came into focus. It had seemed in focus before. But she had only seen it fuzzily.

She saw, now, the dust on the spider webs on the orange girders overhead; she saw paint bubbles on the girders; she saw cracks in the concrete floor, and powdered concrete accumulated in those cracks; she looked into a cat’s eyes and saw the workings of its iris, the crystal-like lines, the simple, translucent glow of life itself. For the first time she saw life as a separate thing, as a field emanating from the animals in the cages and the four human beings standing between them; she saw pores on Capwell’s face; she saw small bits of foam gathered at the corners of his lips; she saw dandruff on the security guard’s shoulders; she saw fear and sadness in the guard’s eyes; she saw cat fur wisping by in the air, blown on the air conditioned breeze; she saw a faint tremor in Capwell’s hands; she smelled bourbon in the air, too, from Capwell; she saw a dog in a cage lying stiffly with its tongue lolling to one side, and she realized it was dead; she saw a fat fly buzz overhead and she saw the iridescent detail of its wings, their each beat visible. She felt her nervous system as clearly as a guitarist feels strings under her fingers; she saw her thoughts, like faint neon images, superimposed over her vision, one pursuing the next…

She turned to look at Boyce, saw the outline of a man and, within the outline, as within a man-shaped bottle, she saw a shimmering, living void…

[coming soon from eReads]


4
Aug 10

Faux Hawk Poem

We put up with beehive hairdos
We shrugged off bell-cuffed pants
We laughed at those Big-Hair-dos
Mullets were viewed askance
We winced at sagging pants-butts
Pink hair was really no shock
–but please God when will we be free
of the pointy-head faux hawk?
–JS


22
Jul 10

A double handful of remarks and observations from John Shirley

//Every bad decision I ever made was as mindless as the jerk of a thumped knee. Nothing guided the decision but fear or animal wiring or trauma. It was as if my thumb was making a decision for my whole body (sometimes another familiar part made the decision). Some dusty, bloated little person in a tiny corner office of me made the decision; an incompetent bureaucrat who runs the government from a forgotten department.

//Some like to pit heart against mind, feeling versus rationality. I tend to the rational and trust it more on the whole but it seems to me that if a feeling, a reading on reality from “the heart center” consistently bears fruit, if a distinct feeling proves its rightness then it IS rational, it’s a higher reason manifesting in the heart. And if we understood the whole process we’d call that one for reason.

//Some scientists speculate the cosmos is a gigantic 3-D computer program–that “nature operates like a computer program.” This is a gigantic vanity. It’s not that nature is modeled by a programmer; it’s that programs are inspired by patterns seen in nature…and feebly imitated, in small measure. The vanity of the hyper-analytic mind has mistaken its own faint, surfacey modeling for the superstructure of reality. 3-D is not enough “D”.

//It’s fashionable to speak of “the present moment”–and that’s good. But there are levels of mindfulness most don’t experience. Even the first level of mindfulness, being in the present moment–self-remembering–can be startling. Suddenly you’re in the real world. Birdsongs, insects, car sounds, sounds of children, the 3-dimensionality of things–suddenly seem to ‘appear’. This was here, around me, all along?

//Libertarianism? Fine–when we can count on unregulated people not to pollute, not to endanger employees (eg, killing 11 of them at a time on oil rigs), not to make dangerous pharms, not to commit consumer fraud, not to wreck the economy, not to insanely drive up the cost of health care, not to need guidance while flying planes; not to need cops, fire dept or infrastructure. Arrange those changes & I’m all for it.

//Looking at trees with new apples strange to think that they apples are communicative, a call to other species, “Eat this and spread my seeds”. Flowers also are communicative between species. Plants calling silently to animals, to insects, “Let’s trade.”

//Does falling organize the world? Isn’t gravitation falling? It’s indicated by falling; by things pulled downward, toward a center of mass. Gravity, anyway, organizes the world; it gives us an up and down, a surface we can walk on, collects mass to offer resistance we use for propulsion; it makes it possible to drop trash in a trash can and have it stay there; to put forks in drawers; to remain seated at my desk.

//For unknown reasons, when consciousness is increased enough the possibilities for free will are mysteriously (not supernaturally–mysteriously) increased. I don’t quite understand why–or, I almost understand it, but I don’t think I can express the why and how of it.

//Old age is right and proper, however dismaying it may seem as we age. What use is a candle that is not lit? It merely takes up space. When it is lit, it gives light, but it also melts. A candle that gives light but does not also melt away is either an abomination of nature, or a miracle. If it’s a miracle then it is not in our province to construct it.

//Conditions have weight. Behavior has momentum.

//There’s a misunderstanding that the right-hand-path, to use a short hand term, is about abasing or losing yourself or demolishing yourself. Not true at all. It’s simply about being in right relationship to the divine source of consciousness, and the Bodhisatvas who try to mitigate, and eventually end, the world’s suffering. But it’s not self annihilation. It’s more like a reshuffling of the inner person so that the ego takes its rightful place, as just one more part of the inner machinery. It’s like taking the keys away from a drunk driver.

//Machines that pollute are only half invented.

//The word “God” has psychological weight that distorts our understanding in a way that’s analogous to a gravity well; to gravitation bending spacetime. We can’t hope to understand the external intelligence as long as we insist on calling it God.

//Music temporarily changes our relationship to time; it reconciles us with time’s disintegration of form.

//I think that the universe is front-loaded to create life just the way it’s front loaded to produce gravity or suns or atomic motion. But I don’t see a creator being necessary. It’s just that in this (one of many?) universe the probability of life is built into the structure of things just as the structure of things is built into the structure of things. How did the strong/weak forces come about? They’re in the nature of materials at hand at the big bang; the probability (not inevitability) of life is presumably in some wise also simply in the nature of matter. There is no need to assume that life requires a supernatural spark and therefore there’s no need to assume that it arises purely by chance as such–if things are innately organized to produce it, *just because they are*, that is no more supernatural than that things are innately organized to produce gravity. It’s not intelligent design–because it’s not design. Life is not designed in; it’s just likely due to some only barely (so far) intuited immanent structuring of matter and energy.

//My character is smarter than my calculator.

//Many scientists think there’s a black hole at the center of every galaxy, central to the formation of galaxies. What is a black hole but a void, an almost infinite gravitational compaction rendering space as a sucking vacuum. Nature it appears does not abhor a vacuum but relies on it. Many philosophers have noted the necessity of death and emptiness; the importance of unoccupied space to occupied form. It should be no surprise when that principle extends to a galactic scale. Principles are as macroscopic as they are microscopic. It is also noted, in the most recent research at this writing, that the massive black hole at the center of a galaxy spins off material which somehow revitalizes the galaxy’s capability of creating stars and planets. From death, life.

//Depression is a concession.

//Everyone shares the unfolding of the universe. We call it “time”.

//We feel insignificant in the vastness of the universe but one could probably travel halfway across the galaxy before coming across another truly intelligent lifeform. It takes an enormity of planetary resources to add up to the building blocks of life and a great many other factors must converge to make possible intelligent life and then civilization. We conclude, then, that while it’s out there somewhere, it is comparatively rare. Any intelligent being then in the vastness of the universe is a rarity. Hence we are no longer to be considered insignificant as individuals.

//People without regret are either fools, self deceiving, or psychopaths. Everyone’s done something wrong, and regret shows you know it and want to do better.

//Organized religion is like organized playtime—it’s for children. But children need reassurance; reassurance is a form of compassion.

//It may be that life at best is just a series of consolations for death. Still, if you identify with perception itself, and not with the memory/personality lost at death, then perhaps death is simply immersion of point of view into the great sea of consciousness. But for most people this is cold comfort. Who knows? I am merely convinced that the root of perception is an extension of a permanent part of the universe.

//Corporate interests rule and will continue to rule. Their alliance with the theocrats will mean only science that makes the rich richer and the environment poorer will be allowed
and hence, ignorance will thrive and when ignorance thrives, corporate interests rule and will continue…

//The stars are a contradiction. They are each one a gigantic sphere of nuclear energy burning furiously in the sky, large enough to consume a planet like ours many many times; they are so big they can be seen across countless light years of interstellar space. But we see them as glimmers, scarcely there, and there are so many that, in contrast to the vastness of the universe each one is indeed tiny. Looking at them dramatizes their vastness and tininess at one time. The scale of the universe is contained in the sight of a single star.


15
Jul 10

Through Black Glass: on Reanimating Lost Cyberpunk for the 21st Century

[I wrote this piece last year for H+ Magazine, re the background and origins of my novel Black Glass--and talking about a certain time with William Gibson in Los Angeles]

Early 1980s, I was sitting in my West Hollywood apartment with William Gibson and a certain movie director who had some buzz going. More than one kind of buzz. We were talking about adapting a story from Burning Chrome for this guy — a story that was as cyberpunk as anything is — and my defining recollection is how frequently the director excused himself to the bathroom only to come back sniffling, trembling and talking with even more rapidfire megalomania than before. Besides adapting the story, I pitched him a script, which was then rather blandly called Macrochip, based on some idea sessions Bill Gibson and I had, and that Peter Wagg (producer of “Max Headroom”) had optioned. And I remember that this director, who enjoyed macho posturing, said, “Just as long as it’s got big fucking balls!”

He didn’t use our script, nor get back to us about Macrochip, and Gibson’s career became stratospheric (Gibson earned it, by dint of talent and hard work). He was soon occupied, say, helping “Mick and Keith” with their stage design for a major tour, and didn’t have a lot of time and… we never did anything else with the story. In the late 1990s I made a feint at turning it into a novel, which I called Black Glass, but by then my writing had sidestepped into a kind of urban fantasy and I wasn’t thinking cyberpunk.

But last year, gazing about me at the great wide world, I remembered Black Glass and was inspired to finish it — because Black Glass dramatizes technology as metaphor, a phenomenon coming clearer every day.

Not that technology as metaphor is new. Going way back, there was the symbol of the steam train chugging across the plains, literally the embodiment of industrialization imposing its badass steel wheels on the natural world. In Lang’s Metropolis and Chaplin’s Modern Times, machines were metaphors for the mechanisms of plutocratic repression. But sometimes we miss the corollary, that real-world technology itself is metaphor, quite outside of drama, as much as that steam train was. Technology is an innately dramatic expression of our condition.

Think back to when technologies were imposed on us that passed labor along to the consumer — when we all began doing unpaid work for corporations. Customer service personnel were replaced by programs that required us to press 1 if we wanted this, 2 if we wanted that, 7 if we wanted to scream. We now do the work of gas station employees, conducting the money transaction ourselves, filling our own tanks. Supermarkets started self-service lines where you and a laser scanner do the checkout person’s job, and airlines now make us check ourselves onto flights at a touch-screen station. It can seem like we’re serving the machines at least as much as they’re serving us.

But it’s the corporations we’re serving. All that technology is, itself, metaphor for our submissive relationship to the multinationals.

Recently a news story from Tokyo flickered through internet news pages: A 43-year-old Japanese piano teacher’s sudden divorce from her online husband in a virtual game world made her so angry that she logged on and killed his digital persona, police said Thursday. The woman has been jailed on suspicion of illegally accessing a computer…

The lady identified with the virtual world so thoroughly that her online reality had become more real to her than the “meat” reality. I know: happens every day. But how very metaphorical indeed…

Now, the underlying story and premise of Black Glass was conceived in an era when cyberpunk writing was more about the existential poetry of science-fiction, more about the sheer sociological drama of technological impact, than about the possibilities of technology or glorying in prediction. We took a step back from it all.

Late 1970s and well into the ’80s, Bill Gibson, Bruce Sterling and I used to correspond. (using physical “snailmail” letters, in those days.) Around the time Neuromancer was published, I wrote to Gibson speculating on how using a word processing program would affect prose writing. He wrote back to me, as always, on a manual typewriter:

“If someone’s going to have style at all, they’ll reach a point where the recording medium is ‘transparent’ anyway… My aversion to the thing is pretty mild… computers per se bore the shit out of me, all that techtalk and the furious enthusiasm of the hobbyist… I think I’ll probably get one before I need to have one…I think a processor might affect my style for a little while…”

Yet when he invented the word ‘cyberspace’ it was on a manual typewriter. We weren’t very deep into technology then — we were deeper into observation, and experience. Cyberpunk writers were influenced by James M. Cain as well as Alfred Bester, and Black Glass reflected that. Gibson was typically all about “the street’s uses for technology” and I was about two-fisted men and women struggling with repression in a near-future dystopia. But was that even relevant anymore, when I returned to Black Glass in the year 2007? My sensibility was more or less hard-nosed pulp, with surreally artistic overtones, the way that punk rock is largely structured noise elevated by the poetry of defiance. That’s not very Neal Stephenson or Cory Doctorow — guys who personified the 2007 paradigm to me.

Yet when I looked around at the great wide world of 2007, I found Black Glass in it. The novel is a futuristic cyberpunk tale about a man emerging from the four-year dormancy of a special prison where his mind was shut down and his body was ordered to work for the state. On release, this ex-cop, Candle, gets embroiled in a fight with one of the 33 corporations that control the world, ’til both he and the corporate overlords are blindsided by an unexpected nemesis: a ‘mindclone’. More properly: this is a ‘semblant’ program — a program that sends an indistinguishable realtime animation of you to virtual conferences, say, or takes webcam calls for you. It knows what you’d say and says it for you, and no one’s sure if it’s really you or not. But a new ‘multisemblant mindclone’ composed of certain powerful men and women, combined into one program, degrades into a psychopathic personality that takes on a life of its own… and in the background street rebels allied with Candle operate a Black Stock Market using cloud computing.

The consciousness-suspension prison is an obvious metaphor with perpetual relevance; the struggle with the big guns of the Fortune 33 is everyman’s struggle in the 21st century; and semblants are an extension of the mind-state that woman in Tokyo was in when she got arrested. We shift our center of identity into digital representations. We overlap with our technology. And sometimes that’s a useful enhancement — other times it only magnifies what’s wrong with us, as with hackable e-voting machines.

And then there’s that Black Stock Market—what’s more relevant in the age of bailouts? So Black Glass was relevant. I just had to update its tech, environmental and cultural references and recognize that my pulp-inflected metaphor may be at the pop end of art, but it’s vitalized by the pointed honesty of its symbols. In the updated Black Glass, Candle stalks through the mordantly named “Autopia,” where people live in improvised structures composed of abandoned gasoline-engine cars. He negotiates “Rooftown,” a towering shanty complex populated by refugees from the great swamp of global warming. The street has its own uses for things, and Candle uses technology exclusive to the rich and powerful, a flying self-driving car, to infiltrate his enemy’s restricted skyscraper compound.

It all came together — because technology itself is metaphor, and when I look around at it, I find that technology is speaking to us. Technology itself is telling us stories. Only, you’ve got to have the nerve to tell them. And there’s one thing Black Glass has for sure…

It’s a “pulp novel of ideas”—with big fucking balls.


15
Jul 10

Some Remarks From the Author About the Lost Cyberpunk Novel

[this is the introduction to the novel published by Elder Signs Press--]

Black Glass was conceived under a different name and as a different kind of project, in the early days of cyberpunk, by myself and William Gibson. That’s not William Gibson the playwright; I mean the author of Neuromancer and Spook Country and all his books in between. We had collaborated on a couple of projects before this one. I don’t remember who came up with the main idea or the general story of Black Glass. I know I wrote up an elaborate tale based on our discussion; I’m the one who fleshed it out and Bill approved it. But then the project got derailed, we both got diverted, and Bill was swept off to collect awards, count his royalties, chill with rock stars, and work on other projects. Subsequently, long subsequently, I remembered the book and inquired; Bill is a busy guy and turned the whole thing over to me.

So some years later I have written the novel, which I think of as the Lost Cyberpunk Novel; I have written it in its entirety. No one else should be held to blame.

Cyberpunk fiction, as written by Bruce Sterling, Lew Shiner, Pat Cadigan, Richard Kadrey, Rudy Rucker and William Gibson (oh—and me), has more roots than the obvious Samuel R. Delany novels (like Nova and Dhalgren), John Brunner novels (like Shockwave Rider and Stand on Zanzibar) and, well, writing by Philip Dick and Alfred Bester and JG Ballard and Michael Moorcock’s NewWave sf, generally. Its antecedents reach back into noir; into hardboiled crime fiction and certain kinds of detective novels. Agatha Christie? Hell no. But James M. Cain? Hell yes. Dashiell Hammett. John D. MacDonald—my memory is that Gibson and Sterling both mentioned, to me, having read most of John D. MacDonald. We all read Jim Thompson, too, probably. And certain very gritty, darkly urbane spy novels were important to cyberpunk: Len Deighton and especially early John LeCarre.

Many of William Gibson’s short stories and early novels share a tone and surface texture not dissimilar to LeCarre and, at times, to the hardboiled, hardnosed detective writers. Crime novel heroes are people on the edge; even when they are working for the law, they don’t mind breaking it along the way; they womanize, they slap gunsels around, they smoke, they drink. They’re moody sons of bitches who slouch down dirty sidewalks under flickering streetlights. Cyberpunk characters have that same grim, doomed, resigned, but simmeringly angry feel about them.

All of these ancestors flock from the past and come home to roost in Black Glass. This is, unabashedly, a crime novel set in the future; its hero, Richard Candle, while a nuanced guy into meditation, is descended from old-style pulp detective heroes. He’d have been perfectly comfortable in Black Mask magazine.

I haven’t tried to be as technologically updated as, no doubt, some of the new crop of cyberpunk writers are. Things happen so fast now I’d never be caught up and wouldn’t fit into the current mode of compacted, cryptographically intense expression. I have not culled a great many terms, memes or tropes from Wired Magazine or Jane’s, or the edgiest technoblogs, or 4chan. But the story has been updated, according to my lights, from the original project; it is both “classic” cyberpunk and a modern science-fiction novel. It is also a John Shirley cyberpunk novel; hence the recurrence of musical references, music as a kind of setting, lyrics, rock-inflected characters, and other idiosyncrasies that hopefully are more endearing than annoying. I didn’t try to write the book in a ‘postmodern’ style; it’s not post-Gibson, either. I wrote this book, in this era, more or less the way I wrote those books back then. That’s how I write the stuff.

The language of Richard Candle’s future society would probably be mostly understandable to us, but would have far more new slang and neologisms than I have provided it with. However, I have undertaken to provide a little, a taste, of the lingo of his time. I doubt if it is language that we will really see in the future but I feel it has the ring of real slang about it and, to my ear, it works. I have provided the Black Glossary to explicate certain terms. And I’d like to point out that, as now, people in the future will not use slang terms in every instance in which they might apply. Sometimes they use them, sometimes they use something else.

Black Glass, perhaps, brings cyberpunk full circle. In a way, it’s a “pulp novel of ideas”. But it is a work of cyberpunk science-fiction; it is woven with science fiction imagery and lit up by science-fiction ideas. It is a crime novel, a novel of the street, and it’s a novel of political attitude: most cyberpunk novels reflect a jaded reaction against authority; an assumption that a world dominated by corporations is a world that was stolen from you before you were born.

But my main hope for Black Glass is simply that readers will enjoy it as entertainment.


J.S., February 2008

UncategorizedNo Comments
7
Jul 10

Thin Young Man With Sandy Hair and Blue Steel in his Hand

[The following was originally the prologue of my forthcoming novel WYATT IN WICHITA. I decided to cut it as leaning too far into fiction--I was trying to write a novel about the young Wyatt Earp with a reasonable amount of historical basis--and it's also a little too pulp-western in tone. Still, I like this vignette, and feel it's a pretty good short story in itself, so here it is, in its only publication]
#
U.S. Marshal Lars Van Galen knew he was dying as soon as he tried to sit up: his heart skipped a beat, and the dusty interior of the ghost-town shack seemed to recede into a shadowy distance. The coldness spreading in his hands and feet told him that the bullet-holes in his side and thigh had poured out an ounce too much blood. That’s what it came down to, an ounce difference, more or less, the docs said. The belt he’d tied around his thigh and the old gingham curtain he’d tried to plug his side with hadn’t availed of much. Strange, too, how cold it felt to him, in here—he knew it was the afternoon of a hot and humid day in the Kansas summer. He tried to get to his feet, but slumped back, shaking. Couldn’t even stand…

A hard place to die—in a town already dead itself. It had been a cattle trading terminus, once; then the railroad had chosen to go to Ellsworth and Wichita, taking the cattle trade with it, and all the water had dried up. Now it was abandoned, occupied only by crows, two murderous thieves and a dying lawman.

Hold on, you old fool, until the job’s done, he told himself, bracing his back against the wall. Those two hard-cases would come to him, momentarily. He might do for the sons of bitches yet.

If he could just finish the job–that much he could leave behind. He had no kin, his wife and son both having died on him. He had no money to leave anyone at all. His will left his saddle, his guns and his broken gold watch to Miss Jandia Coleman, a fancy girl at Windaman’s Fine Wines and Spirits, otherwise known as the only surviving saloon in Plain’s Edge. Jandia was the closest he had to a friend, any more, the others having died or moved on. Maybe she could sell his guns and the saddle for seventy dollars or thereabouts. She’d likely use the money for the laudanum she was becoming too fond of.

Apart from that, all he could leave behind was one more finished job—and the prairie of 1873 just a mite safer.
He tightened his hold on the blue-steel Army revolver till his knuckles went white. He had to get a good grip on it, if he hoped to use it, but he felt like he was wearing thick woolen gloves—and they were getting thicker. Still, he hoped to kill at least Angus O’Reilly, before O’Reilly and Tolliver finished their own job. Right now, their job, as they saw it, was to kill a U.S. Marshal.

Stupid to have gone after them himself. They had crossed territorial lines, after their crime, making them federal fugitives, but he could have sent word for the County Sheriff…Only, the Sheriff probably would have made excuses and not gone.

He strained to see his pistol clearly–he had lost the ability to see sharp up close when he’d past fifty-three years, and his present weakness made things even blurrier. He held the gun out at arm’s length, propped on a knee, and peered at it, fumbling with the loading gate. He got it open, spun the cylinder. Three rounds remained unfired in their chambers. That was the end of his ammunition…It might be enough, if he could point the gun straight.

But oh Lord, the weariness; that feeling in his middle parts, like someone clamping him hard with a blacksmith’s gripper; the cold burning in his leg. Maybe just lay back and go to sleep. Why die painful?
Come on, you son of a buck, rear up one last time and be of some goddamned use.
He closed the loading gate, turned the cylinder to put the first round in place. Working hard at it, he thumbed back the hammer spur, cocking the gun. Funny how something that had come effortlessly for so long, as natural as breathing, had gotten to be as hard as lifting a buckboard’s axle. But breathing itself was hard to do now…

The pain was almost gone, lost in a fog. He knew that wasn’t good. Pain meant you were alive…

He cocked his knee too, propped the gun butt on his kneecap—and just then the door opened and a man came in. Van Galen squeezed the trigger…

Nothing happened. The fall he’d taken in the dirt outside had jammed the firing mechanism; it would cock but the hammer wouldn’t fall. He sighed, and waited for the tall, thin silhouette in front of him to blow him to kingdom come.
Funny how you never thought about those words, though you used them a thousands times. “Kingdom Come.”
He was about to find out if there was a kingdom to come…

“If you’ll point that gun somewheres else,” said the figure in the doorway, “I’ll see if I can help you, Marshal.” Not Tolliver or O’Reilly, by the voice.

“Who…would you be?”

“I was riding by,” said the young man. He was still blurry to Van Galen, but his voice and his gait, coming closer, all said he was young. “I heard the shots. I rode up, and I saw a couple of fellows moving around back of this shack—maybe fifty feet back, by that old smoke house. Looked like they were concerned to get the drop on you. Coming real careful.” The stranger went down on one knee, lifted the Marshal’s shirt out of the way, and the improvised bandage. Shook his head. “Don’t look good.”

“It…it ain’t good boy. This here wreck of a shack is the last room I’ll see…If you’ll take my effects…to Plain’s Edge…Undertaker has my will there…My name’s…” He had to pause, try to get some spit in his mouth; it was most too leathery to talk with.

“Yes sir. I know you—you’re Marshal Van Galen. I saw you over to Ellsworth, more than once, when I was bringing in buffalo skins.”

“Listen boy–you shouldn’t be…” Van Galen had to swallow hard to finish the sentence. “…shouldn’t have your back to the door. They’ll kill you, them two, just…just in case, like.”
The young man nodded, half turning to face the door.

“Maybe I can get you some water, a smoke, anyways.”

“No, boy—oh there’s nothin’ I’d like more. But…no time.”

The young man shifted, hunkering back to think. He had sandy hair, a lean face, a pale mustache that was still more vanity than mustache, a sharply defined nose and jaw; grave gray-blue eyes. Sandy blond hair.

Not so different from what his own son would’ve looked like, as a young man, Van Galen thought, with a pang that hurt more than his wounds.

The slim stranger lifted his head, listening; Van Galen had seen a wolf do it that way, once. The young man’s eyes flicked to the walls, moving to follow a sound the Marshal couldn’t hear. His hearing was faded with age—and with dying.

“They’re coming,” the young man said. Van Galen thought that was what he said, anyway, judging by the movement of his lips. He’d spoken so softly it was barely audible.

The young man drew his own side-arm, a cap-and-ball pistol from the Civil War—probably a gift from an older relative. Van Galen saw the young man swallow, and there was just a little tremble in his gun hand. The boy was scared. Natural enough, but it wouldn’t help him.

“No use,” Van Galen rasped. He worked up some wetness in his mouth and went on, “No use asking them boys for quarter, they don’t give none. You give me your gun, I…” But he knew that was a mistake. “No. I’d miss. I’m too weak to squeeze a trigger. You got to do it…”

“Me?” The young man licked his lips. Slowly, so as not to make much noise, he stood, the gun dangling at his side. “I was a constable—over in Missouri–but I never had to shoot on the job. Never did much but wrestle down drunks and runaway pigs. Wounded a drunk brakeman one time in a fight in a…well, a bar… but I wasn’t trying to kill him. “That…” He shook his head.

Van Galen gathered what little strength he had. He had nothing left to leave the world—except advice. “You got to do it, if you want to live. Got to. Now, what you do is, when it’s time to shoot–don’t hurry. They’re going to be in a hurry. That’s bad for the aim. And they’re drunk—they always got a bottle with ‘em. That’ll maybe give you an edge. You take enough time to aim, and say to yourself it’s up to the Lord if you live. Got to accept you might not live—or you’ll be afeerd, and that, it’ll kill you right there.”

The young man nodded, his head cocked. There was a vibration in the floor—the gunmen had come around to the front of the shack. One of them had set his foot, probably, on the step.

“And boy…” Van Galen continued. “Boy, you…stretch out your arm, point your gun like pointing your finger. Squeeze the trigger. And…Turn sideways so you’ll make less a target…And if you…” He never got to say the rest.

The young man had heard him, and turned sideways, pointing the gun at the door—just as it burst inward, and O’Reilly, big and red-faced, teeth bared, hair all bloused out like a desert plant, came lurching in; behind him was the slick-haired, fox-faced Tolliver, the gambler. Both of them wanted for murdering a jeweler up in St. Louis; both with their pistols in hand. They stopped, startled by the boy—
“Who the hell!”

“Just kill him, you knothead!” Tolliver shouted, cocking his gun

But all this time the young man was taking aim, his gun-hand shaking a little but pointed straight enough. He fired, and the old revolver bucked back in his slender hand, recoiling so it pointed nearly at the ceiling; but he instantly lowered it back level to fire again as O’Reilly staggered back, his Dragoon firing wildly. A window shattered above Van Galen, and he felt bits of glass raining down on his bare head. Already the shack was filled with gun smoke; an instant, acrid blue fog.

Tolliver snarled and shoved O’Reilly aside, bringing his gun to bear but the young constable was firing, and firing again, and twice more, seeming to find a sort of calm inner rhythm, and Tolliver went spinning back to fall across O’Reilly, who was staring in amazement, mouth quivering, eyes glazing.

Tolliver’s gun rose up from the floor like a rattlesnake—wavering there—and the young man stepped to one side, and fired twice more. He took a step closer to the outlaws, the gun smoke billowing around him with his movement, and pulled the trigger again, but this time there was only a click. He had discharged every bullet.

The young man stared at the dead men for a long moment…and then took a deep breath. Coughing from the powder smoke, he returned to hunker, again, by Van Galen’s side.

I believe they are done for,” the young man said.

How very thick the gun smoke was, in the room, Van Galen thought. So thick and black, like soot from a locomotive. But maybe that wasn’t gun smoke. Maybe that was the final darkness coming. Peaceful and cool.

“Boy,” Van Galen heard himself say, his own voice echoing in his head. “Listen…some…last advice…don’t tell folks you done this. Nor say I done it—wouldn’t want you to lie. But see, boy…you don’t want to be known…as a gunman. Ain’t wise. Best they think…you’ve no wish to use a gun…Other…otherwise…”

“Why, I think I’d do it that way, anyhow,” said the young man. “Having no wish to use a gun, I mean, unless I must.” His voice sounded so far away now. “But I’ll take your advice—you sure know the job. I’d not have come out of here alive had I not heeded you, sir.”

“You done fine. You, so like…my Lou, he’d a-been…oh, I’m failing. Tell me this, boy…what’s your name? I would know it before I go…”

“Why sir, my name’s…”

But the darkness drew its own shroud over the Marshal, then. He did not hear the young man name himself.

“…Wyatt Earp.”


4
Jul 10

Writers and the Internet–Downhill Slide?

[this piece originally appeared in RU Sirius's online publication 10 Zen Monkeys]

The internet has some advantages for writers, which I gladly exploit; it offers some access to new audiences, it offers new venues… But it has even more disadvantages.

A recent study suggested that young people read approximately half as much as young people did before the advent of the internet and videogames. While there are enormous bookstores, teeming with books, chain stores and online book dealing now dominate the book trade and it may be that there are fewer booksellers overall. A lot of fine books are published but, on the whole, publishers push for the predictable profit far more than they used to, which means they prefer predictable books. Editors are no longer permitted to make decisions on their own. They must consult marketing departments before buying a book. Book production has become ever more like television production: subordinate to trendiness, and the anxiety of executives.

And in my opinion this is partly because a generation intellectually concussed by the impact of the internet and other hyperactive, attention-deficit media, is assumed, probably rightly, to want superficial reading.

I know people earnestly involved in producing dramas for iPod download and transmission to iPhones. Obviously, productions of that sort are oriented to small images in easy-to-absorb bites. Episodes are often only a few minutes long. Or even shorter. Broadband drama, produced to be seen on the internet, is also attention-deficit-oriented. I’ve written for episodic television and have known the frustration of writers told to cut their “one hour” episodes down to 42 minutes, so that more commercials can be crammed in. Losing ten minutes of drama takes a toll on the writing of a one hour show — just imagine the toll taken by being restricted to three-minute episodes. Story development becomes staccato, pointlessly violent (because that translates well to the form), childishly melodramatic, simple minded to the extreme.

All this may be an extension of the basic communication format forged by the internet: email, chatrooms, instant messages, board postings, blogs. Email is usually telegraphic in form, compact, and without the literary feel that letters once had; communication in chatrooms is reduced to soundbites that will fit into the little message window and people are impatient in chatrooms, unwilling to wait as a long sentence is formulated; instant messages are even more compressed, superficial, and not even in real English; board postings may be lengthier but if they are, no one reads them.

Same goes for blogs. They’d better be short thoughts or — for the most part — few will trouble to read them. The internet is always tugging at you to move on, surf on, check this and that, talk to three people at once. How do you maintain long thoughts, how do you stretch out intellectually, in those conditions? Sometimes at places like The Well, perhaps, people are more thoughtful. But in general, online readers are prone to be attention challenged.

Reading at one’s computer is, also, not as comfortable as reading a book in an armchair — so besides the distractions, it’s simply a drag to spend a lot of time reading a single document online. But people spend a great deal of time and energy online, time and energy which is then not available for that armchair book. Occasionally someone breaks the rules and puts long stories online, as Rudy Rucker has done, admirably well, posting new stories by various writers at flurb.net. But for the most part, the internet is inimical to stretching out, literarily.

The genie is out of the bottle, and we cannot go back. But it would be well if people did not misrepresent the literary value of writing for the internet.